caughtinanetwork | 1 fishy fishy

Entry tags:

1 fishy fishy

three guesses to who totally has a girlfriend now and the first two don't count!

[ ooc: Way before fairy guts. A day after this. ]

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

IGNORE THE SHIT THAT EGBE
...
ignore the shit egbert says
wow
sorry
i like almost caps all over this shit
i also apparently seem to be losing my grasp on the english language
seek help

HA HA HA.
AFTER THAT TIME YOU GAVE ME SHIT IN THAT MEMO, I THINK I AM MORE THAN A LITTLE JUSTIFIED IN CALLING YOU ON THE REEK OF THAT EXCREMENT.
YOU AND JADE
WHO THINKS THE CHART'S STUPID NOW, STRIDER?

wow
i take back what i said about egbert should drown
go drown somewhere vantas
what jade and i do is none of your fucking business anyways
so suck it

NO THANKS, ALREADY GOT SOMEONE TO HATE ME.

jegus
christ
i dont give a darn shit
about your quadrants
i thought we went over this bullshit already

AND NOW I'M FORBIDDEN FROM JOKING ABOUT IT?
THANKS FOR THE MEMO ON THAT ONE
ABSOLUTELY NO MAKING LIGHT OF SHIT THAT'S FINALLY DEALT WITH, LET ME JUST WRITE THAT DOWN FOR THE AGES.

excuse me
for not wanting to talk about that shit so soon
whoops
sometimes i can be a sensitive fucking snowflake
its difficult since id melt in texas
so it isnt a rare moment
but it happens
weh weh

WHATEVER.
I WASN'T PLANNING ON GOING INTO IT BEYOND THAT ANYWAY, AND YOU BETTER NOT EITHER.
CONSIDER THE SUBJECT DROPPED, ASSHOLE.

i might
just to spite you
but that actually is more work then its worth
and its pretty fucking easy to rile you up anyways

OH FUCK OFF
I DON'T DIG INTO YOUR PERSONAL EMBARRASSMENTS TO PISS YOU OFF.

it doesnt take a lot
to piss you off
just saying

AND THIS IS NEWS TO ANYONE?
JUST DON'T USE THAT TOPIC FOR IT, GOT IT.

dude i wont
its kind of
an embarrassing topic for me too
why would i potentially embarrass myself to embarrass you???

AS LONG AS YOU GET THAT THEN
ALRIGHT.
NOW GO FUCK OFF AND BE ANNOYING SOMEWHERE ELSE.

[TEXT]

knightime - 2012-01-21 09:00 (UTC) - Expand

[TEXT]

bethehugejerk - 2012-01-21 09:01 (UTC) - Expand

[TEXT]

knightime - 2012-01-21 09:02 (UTC) - Expand

[TEXT]

bethehugejerk - 2012-01-21 09:04 (UTC) - Expand

[TEXT]

knightime - 2012-01-21 09:07 (UTC) - Expand

[TEXT]

bethehugejerk - 2012-01-21 09:08 (UTC) - Expand

...
but when i told you i liked aradia instead of rose you thought your chart was null and stupid.

1) YOU'RE DUMB
2) THE CHART WAS ALREADY RIGHT ONCE
3) ROSE ISN'T EVEN HERE ANYMORE
4) THINGS ARE WEIRD HERE ANYWAY
5) THAT DOESN'T MAKE IT INACCURATE WITH THOSE TWO!

i don't think you are making very good points on why you are right.
that list is just an insult and a bunch of excuses.

WE HAVE ALREADY ESTABLISHED YOUR DUMBNESS FOREVER, EGBERT
IT HAS BEEN RESTATED AND REITERATED MANY TIMES WITH MANY PHRASINGS
AND IT IS NO LESS TRUE NOW THAN IT WAS BEFORE.
ALSO, THEY'RE NOT EXUCSES
THEY'RE LEGITIMATE ARGUMENTS.

having a chart should always be accurate though not just conditionally, numbnuts!
otherwise it's just like bingo where you guess things and then coincidence happens.

BUT BOTH THINGS WERE RIGHT IN THE PAST!
YOU AND ROSE DATED ONCE BEFORE
AND NOW HIM AND JADE.

yeah but why am i not enamored with rose now??
so your chart is only always a one-time thing and then it stops being true?
i don't think that is how being right works!

SHUT UP, I ALREADY TOLD YOU I DON'T CARE ENOUGH TO KEEP A RUNNING TAB ON EVERYTHING.
I WAS RIGHT AT ONE POINT IN TIME AND THAT'S ALL I CARE ABOUT FOR THIS.

ok obviously i win this argument.
are you taking notes?
jegus, get a fucking pen.

WHY THE FUCK WOULD I TAKE NOTES ON THIS??
ALSO YOU DIDN'T WIN BECAUSE MY POINT WAS TOTALLY VALID.

"shut up, i was right once" is a valid point?