cakesaretheenemy: (a superdope homeboy from the oaktown)
John Egbert | ectoBiologist ([personal profile] cakesaretheenemy) wrote in [community profile] caughtinanetwork2012-01-17 02:16 am

1 fishy fishy

three guesses to who totally has a girlfriend now and the first two don't count!

[ ooc: Way before fairy guts. A day after this. ]
unconchonable: (WWOWW RUDE)

[TEXT]

[personal profile] unconchonable 2012-01-29 01:45 pm (UTC)(link)
FUCK YOU NO IM NOT
youre the incompetent one wwhen it comes to lookin fuckin good kar not me
i got this fashion thing dowwn like you dont evven KNOWW

[TEXT]

[personal profile] bethehugejerk 2012-01-29 02:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I AM NOT INCOMPETENT!
MY STYLE IS UNDERSTATED AND SIMPLE AND NOT BEDECKED IN STRIPES AND EXTRA COLORS.
unconchonable: (rolllllll)

[TEXT]

[personal profile] unconchonable 2012-01-29 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)
yes you are
and understated you claim
kar please
more like nonexistent
i bet i could make you look a hundred times better if you evven gavve me the chance to

[TEXT]

[personal profile] bethehugejerk 2012-01-29 02:13 pm (UTC)(link)
IF I WANTED A MAKEOVER I WOULD GO TO KANAYA FIRST, AND THE DOLOROSA SECOND.
I ALREADY TRIED HOODIES AND BUTTON-DOWN SHIRTS FOR YOU, WHAT MORE DO YOU NEED?

[TEXT]

[personal profile] bethehugejerk 2012-01-29 02:16 pm (UTC)(link)
GO START A FIRE THROUGH YOUR OWN INCOMPETENCE AND DIE IN IT, SHITHEAD.

[TEXT]

[personal profile] bethehugejerk 2012-01-29 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
JOHN, BOTH OF US ARE MALE.
HE DOESN'T EVEN HAVE THE ILLUSION OF BOOBS.
AND FOR THE LAST TIME I'M NOT GETTING WHIPPED!

[TEXT]

[personal profile] bethehugejerk 2012-01-29 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)
THE HOODIES WERE GIFTS AND THE BUTTON-DOWN THING WAS FROM THAT WEEK WHEN OUR AGES WERE DIFFERENT.
SHUT UP.
unconchonable: (oh is THAT so)

[TEXT]

[personal profile] unconchonable 2012-01-29 02:23 pm (UTC)(link)
wwoww fuckin rude im insulted kar howw the fuck could you go to them before your owwn MATESPRIT
but ANYWWAY you look damn good in those dont you so obvviously i knoww wwhat im doin
and wwhat more do i need wwell im sure youd look good in some color too kar like maybe a plaid neckerchief or somethin a the sort an better shoes

[TEXT]

[personal profile] bethehugejerk 2012-01-29 02:26 pm (UTC)(link)
THEY WORK BECAUSE THEY ARE SIMPLE AND COMFORTABLE, DAMNIT.
NECKERCHIEFS AND ME ARE THINGS THAT ARE NOT EVER GOING TO HAPPEN IN THE SAME VICINITY.
NEVER.
NOT HAPPENING.
NOPE.
NO FUCKING WAY.
AND I'M NOT GOING TO SUBJECT MY FEET TO YOUR IDEA OF SHOES, EITHER.
unconchonable: (brb judgin so hard)

[TEXT]

[personal profile] unconchonable 2012-01-29 02:37 pm (UTC)(link)
wwhats wwrong wwith neckerchiefs they actually look pretty fuckin great
wwas thinkin about gettin me a feww actually
and okay wwhats that evven mean
my idea of shoes
wwhats wwrong wwith my shoes

[TEXT]

[personal profile] bethehugejerk 2012-01-29 02:39 pm (UTC)(link)
YOU HAVE A TON OF SCARVES ALREADY, JUST STICK TO THEM.
BUT YOUR SHOES ARE UGLY.
unconchonable: (WWHY)

[TEXT]

[personal profile] unconchonable 2012-01-29 02:47 pm (UTC)(link)
theres nothin wwrong wwith vvariety
wwhat the fuck is so bad about neckerchiefs kar
ALSO FUCK YOU NO THEY ARENT

[TEXT]

[personal profile] bethehugejerk 2012-01-29 02:48 pm (UTC)(link)
YOU HAVE VARIETY!
WHAT ABOUT THE ONES I GAVE YOU FOR CHRISTMAS.
AND YES THEY ARE.
unconchonable: (ill take wwhatevver tuna vvoice i wwant)

[TEXT]

[personal profile] unconchonable 2012-01-29 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
thats vvariety in SCARVVES an ivve been wwearin nothin BUT the ones youvve givven me kar if you havvent noticed
that still doesnt answwer wwhat you havve against neckerchiefs
NO THEYRE NOT
Edited 2012-01-29 15:00 (UTC)

[TEXT]

[personal profile] bethehugejerk 2012-01-29 09:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I JUST DON'T SEE THE POINT, BUT WHATEVER.
WEAR THE STUPID THINGS IF YOU WANT.
unconchonable: (slurping oysters)

[TEXT]

[personal profile] unconchonable 2012-01-30 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)
the point is lookin good kar
theres nothin wwrong wwith that

[TEXT]

[personal profile] bethehugejerk 2012-01-31 06:22 pm (UTC)(link)
FOR A GIVEN VALUE OF "NICE".